Case 3319191/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Robbins v Easy Life FS Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3319191/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Robbins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim, and judgment was entered for the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal listed the claim for hearing on 13 January 2020, but that hearing was cancelled after judgment was entered on the papers.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the claimant was awarded £1,933.91 for unpaid wages and £3,810 by way of redundancy payment. The redundancy sum was calculated in the judgment as 5 years x 1.5 x £508, with £508 identified as the statutory maximum week's pay. The total award ordered to be paid was £5,743.91.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment labels this head of claim as 'Unpaid Wages' and awards £1,933.91 in compensation. It does not cite a statutory provision, but the wording matches an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £1,934 |
| Redundancy | The judgment awards a redundancy payment of £3,810, calculated as 5 years x 1.5 x £508 statutory maximum week's pay. | Upheld | — | £3,810 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,744
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.