Case 3319348/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319348/2019
- Decision date
- 26 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a telephone preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Wyeth sitting alone at Watford on 26 March 2020. The tribunal recorded that the correct name of the respondent is E-ACT.
The tribunal held that the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service to pursue a claim of ordinary unfair dismissal, so that claim was dismissed. It also found that the claimant's complaint of direct age discrimination was presented out of time.
On the age discrimination complaint, the tribunal decided it would not be just and equitable to extend time. The judgment therefore states that claim number 3319348/2019 is dismissed in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service to pursue ordinary unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The direct age discrimination complaint was out of time and the tribunal decided it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.