Case 3319353/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Mrs Z Barice, Office Manager. — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319353/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr T Passfield had worked for the respondent, Ian Milligan T/A P&I Milligan, and had brought a claim for unpaid wages only. At the hearing in Bury St Edmunds on 31 January 2020, the respondent was represented by Mrs Z Barice, Office Manager, and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal found that wages remained unpaid by the respondent. It therefore upheld the claim for unpaid wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £331.90.
The tribunal stated that the sum was a gross payment and that the respondent was to account to the claimant and HMRC for any Income Tax and National Insurance payable. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant brought a claim for unpaid wages only. The tribunal found wages remained unpaid and ordered payment of £331.90 gross. | Upheld | — | £332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £332
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.