Case 3319392/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr GD Barbu v Father Bull Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319392/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr GD Barbu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. In a letter dated 26 January 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with tribunal orders dated 8 September 2019 and 3 November 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Laidler ordered that the claim be struck out under rule 37. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and does not identify any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with tribunal orders dated 8 September 2019 and 3 November 2019 and for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.