Case 3319403/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Kelly v Belron UK Limited t/a Autoglass — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319403/2019
- Decision date
- 19 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Decision
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a judgment dated 19 May 2020, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claimant's claim under rule 37. The judgment records that on 24 February 2020 the tribunal wrote to the claimant inviting written representations or a request for a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not determine the claim on the merits. It struck out the claim after a letter dated 24 February 2020 invited representations or a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.