Case 3319502/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Burgon v SA Law LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319502/2019
- Decision date
- 14 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Burgon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a record of a preliminary hearing on 1 September 2020 before Employment Judge George sitting alone. The record states that an earlier judgment had dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it, and that the Equality Act 2010 complaints were given an extension of time. No merits decision is recorded here on the Equality Act claims, and the case remained listed for a final hearing.
For the remaining issues, the Tribunal recorded that the respondent had conceded on 24 July 2020 that the claimant was a disabled person at all relevant times because of ulcerative colitis. The case management record then set out the claimant’s reasonable adjustments issues under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010, including the allegation that she was required to park seven minutes from the office, and the harassment issues under section 26 Equality Act 2010 said to arise from alleged unwanted conduct by Rik Patel related to sex and/or sexual harassment.
The record also listed remedy issues that would arise only if the claimant succeeded at final hearing, including compensation, injury to feelings, interest, and any possible adjustment under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Consolidation Act 1992. The document therefore records procedural directions and the issues to be determined later, rather than any substantive findings on the Equality Act complaints or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The record refers to an earlier judgment dismissing the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Equality Act 2010 sections 20 and 21
- Equality Act 2010 section 26
- section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Consolidation Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.