In person. For the v Respondent — 2019

Case reference: 3319512/2019
Decision date: 7 November 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge M Bloom Appearances
Venue: Bury St Edmunds

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person. For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. It held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that claim because the claimant had less than 2 years’ continuous service.

The judgment recorded that the claimant’s remaining discrimination claims, listed in a separate Case Management Summary document, were not determined at this hearing. Those claims were directed to proceed to a final hearing at Norwich Employment Tribunal on 7 to 14 September 2020 inclusive.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed because the Employment Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim, as the claimant had less than 2 years' continuous service.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.