Case 3319567/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Kidane v Cuppacoff Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3319567/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Kidane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Lewis struck out Ms Y Kidane's claim against Cuppacoff Limited because she failed to comply with the unless order of 26 July 2021. The judgment records that the claim was struck out rather than determined on its merits.
The hearing listed for 9 to 11 March 2022 was vacated. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the unless order dated 26/7/2021. The judgment does not determine the merits of this head of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the unless order dated 26/7/2021. The judgment does not determine the merits of this head of claim. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the unless order dated 26/7/2021. The judgment does not determine the merits of this head of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.