Case 3319569/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kwiatkowski, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319569/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Kwiatkowski, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing on 27 April 2020 before Employment Judge Skehan, the tribunal recorded that the entirety of Ms Paulina Marta Kosiak's claims against Design Go Limited in case 3319569/2019 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not set out the substantive allegations or any findings on liability.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment contains no merits reasoning, legal analysis, or adverse findings beyond the procedural disposal on withdrawal. The case therefore concludes with dismissal of the claims as withdrawn rather than a determination of the underlying issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK case listing; the judgment itself only states that the entirety of the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK case listing; the judgment itself only states that the entirety of the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.