Case 3319583/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Nyarko v Oakdale Care Homes No 2 Limited and Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3319583/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Nyarko
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. No findings on liability, compensation, or any other remedy are recorded in the extracted text.
The extracted judgment text does not set out any factual findings on the merits and does not identify a remedy award. The only procedural outcome recorded is that the claims were withdrawn and the proceedings were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.