Case 3319598/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Simpson v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3319598/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal had written to the claimant on 14 September 2019 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The complaint of unfair dismissal was therefore struck out.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 27 April 2020, but it does not identify or decide those claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal because it had no reasonable prospect of success after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. It states that remaining claim(s) remained listed for a later hearing, but does not identify or adjudicate them. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.