Case 3319760/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Ewington v Mr Stuart Monk — 2019
- Case reference
- 3319760/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Ewington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment made because the time limit for presenting a response had expired on 19 August 2019 and no response had been filed. On the available material, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto decided that a determination could properly be made without a hearing.
The tribunal found that Mr Andrew Ewington had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. It held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,048, calculated as 6 weeks at £508.
The claimant's claims for damages for breach of contract, described as notice pay, and for unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday were found to have been presented outside the time limit for presenting complaints, so the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider them. The tribunal also recorded that other sums claimed were not within its jurisdiction, and the hearing listed for 29 November 2019 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,048, calculated as 6 weeks at £508. | Upheld | — | £3,048 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for damages for breach of contract, described as notice pay, was said to have been presented outside the time limit for presenting complaints, so the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages claim was found to have been presented outside the time limit, and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday claim was found to have been presented outside the time limit, and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal stated that other sums claimed by the claimant were not within the jurisdiction of the employment tribunal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,048
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.