Case 3319880/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Rozanski v NFT Distribution Operations Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3319880/2019
- Decision date
- 14 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Rozanski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr D Rozanski's claim against Nft Distribution Operations Ltd (In Administration). The tribunal recorded that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that, on 12 October 2021, the claimant had been given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. It found that no acceptable reason had been given.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claim on 22 November 2021. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award, and the case was sent to the parties on 14 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim and did not determine the merits of this head of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim and did not determine the merits of this head of claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim and did not determine the merits of this head of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.