Case 3319997/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Aminova v Gardarica Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3319997/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Aminova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis entered judgment under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 after Gardarica Limited failed to present a response to Miss J Aminova's claim. The judgment records that no response was entered, and that judgment was therefore entered in the claimant's favour.
The tribunal found that the claimant was owed unpaid holiday pay. It awarded £2,835.00 gross in compensation and ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant. No other heads of loss, uplift, or additional remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment entered after the respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed unpaid holiday pay and awarded £2,835.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,835 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,835
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,835
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.