Case 3320037/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Failed to attend — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320037/2019
- Decision date
- 21 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge Employment Tribunal by Employment Judge King, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent failing to attend. The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to give the claimant pay statements in accordance with s.8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and failed to provide a s.1 statement that complied with all requirements.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. It ordered the respondent, Leanne Joyce French t/a Tiny Horizons Day Nursery, to pay the claimant £2,461.06 in respect of those unlawful deductions. No separate monetary award was recorded for the pay statement or written particulars findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give pay statements in accordance with s.8 ERA 1996 and failed to provide a compliant s.1 statement, and held that the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claims succeeded. | Upheld | — | £2,461 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,461
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.