Case 3320049/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Kabab Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320049/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJudgment was entered in default because the respondent did not present a response. The claimant, Mr D Andrei Chirila, succeeded on his claim for accrued unpaid holiday. The tribunal found that six days' holiday pay were due and ordered Kabab Ltd to pay £27.50 net per day, totalling £165.00 net.
The claimant's redundancy pay claim did not succeed. The tribunal said the claim was misconceived because the claimant had not worked for the respondent for a continuous period of at least two years and had only worked for eight months. The redundancy pay claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued unpaid holiday succeeded in default of a response; tribunal awarded six days' holiday pay at £27.50 net per day. | Upheld | — | £165 |
| Redundancy | Claim was described as misconceived because the claimant had not worked for the respondent for a continuous period of at least two years; the judgment records eight months' service. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £165
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.