Case 3320154/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Dvoreckiene v Banham Poultry Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320154/2019
- Decision date
- 25 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Dvoreckiene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Postle signed judgment in this case on 3 August 2022, and it was sent to the parties and entered in the register on 25 August 2022. The extracted judgment records that Mrs R Dvoreckiene's claims against Banham Poultry Limited were dismissed because they were no longer being actively pursued.
No substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claims are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is therefore a procedural dismissal rather than a determination of liability on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claimant's claims were no longer being actively pursued; no substantive merits findings were recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed because the claimant's claims were no longer being actively pursued; no substantive merits findings were recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.