Case 3320184/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Soszynski, Paralegal For the v Mr M Cameron, Employment Consultant — 2020

Case reference: 3320184/2019
Decision date: 24 August 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Soszynski, Paralegal For the

Respondent

Mr M Cameron, Employment Consultant

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing by telephone on 24 August 2020 before Employment Judge Bedeau. The judgment did not decide the merits of the underlying claim; it dealt only with whether the parties had reached a settlement.

The tribunal recorded that the respondent offered to pay £2,500 subject to a completed COT3. The claimant counter-offered that £2,500 should be paid within 7 days and that the respondent should provide a reference.

The tribunal found there was no agreement on those terms. In particular, there was no agreement to pay the sum within 7 days and no agreement that a reference would be provided, so no COT3 was signed by the parties.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment was limited to a preliminary hearing on settlement. It recorded that there was no agreement between the parties settling the claim, and did not determine the merits of the underlying breach of contract claim.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.