Case 3320219/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Elms v And Click Print Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320219/2019
- Decision date
- 23 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Elms
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 24 August 2020 the tribunal wrote to Miss L Elms saying an Employment Judge was considering striking out the claim because she had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 9 April 2020. She was given until 7 September 2020 to object in writing or request a hearing at which she could do so.
Miss Elms did not respond. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim for failure to comply with the order under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the listed sex discrimination and unfair dismissal claims and no monetary award.
The hearing listed for 26-29 April 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed under rule 37 for failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 9 April 2020; no merits determination or monetary award. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 37 for failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 9 April 2020; no merits determination or monetary award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.