Case 3320258/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Blazejczak v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 3320258/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Blazejczak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was received to the claimant's claim, and the tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £1,621.36. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £1,524.00 for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,524.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response received to the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,621 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,524 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment in this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,524 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,669
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.