Case 3320265/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hussain v Wokingham Borough Council v — 2021
- Case reference
- 3320265/2019
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Panel members
- Ms L Farrell, Mr F Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by CVP on 1 September 2021 before Employment Judge Hawksworth, Ms L Farrell and Mr F Wright. The claimant, Mr K Hussain, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Wokingham Borough Council, was represented by Mr J Cook, counsel.
The tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's claim under rule 47 because of the claimant's non-attendance. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying allegations, and no remedy was awarded.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment. On the face of the judgment, the only adjudicated outcome is dismissal of the claim for non-attendance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing on 1 September 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.