Case 3320276/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Skidmore v British Gas Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320276/2019
- Decision date
- 18 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heal Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Skidmore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under rule 52 as a judgment on withdrawal. It records that the claimant withdrew the claim.
Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the claims or make any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The GOV.UK listing categories include unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages and working time regulations, but the judgment itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. Specific pleaded claims are not set out in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The GOV.UK listing categories include this claim type, but the judgment itself does not separately identify or adjudicate it; it records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The GOV.UK listing categories include this claim type, but the judgment itself does not separately identify or adjudicate it; it records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The GOV.UK listing categories include this claim type, but the judgment itself does not separately identify or adjudicate it; it records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.