Case 3320443/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A Owen, solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320443/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone at Watford on 6 April 2020 before Employment Judge R Lewis. The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £348.43 in full and final settlement of the claimant's claims.
The written record does not set out separate findings of fact or legal reasoning on liability, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. On the face of the written judgment, the only recorded outcome is a consent disposal of the claims for the stated sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £348.43 in full and final settlement of the claimant's claims. The judgment does not allocate any part of the sum to this claim specifically. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £348.43 in full and final settlement of the claimant's claims. The judgment does not allocate any part of the sum to this claim specifically. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £348
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.