Case 3320510/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Ali v Simon Darfoor — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320510/2021
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Quill therefore made a determination on the papers. The judgment records that the claim was issued in the South Eastern Employment Tribunals on 12 September 2021.
The tribunal found that Simon Darfoor had made unauthorised deductions from Miss A Ali’s wages. No further reasoning or factual detail is given in the extracted judgment beyond that finding.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,281.78. The judgment does not record any separate award breakdown, interest, or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,282 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,282
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.