Case 3320511/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Lock v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320511/2021
- Decision date
- 6 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Lock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied on 19 March 2023 for reconsideration of a reserved judgment dated 23 February 2023 and sent to the parties on 6 March 2023. The application was not accompanied by any document by which the claimant complied with the order recorded at paragraph 10 of the reasons for that reserved judgment.
Employment Judge Hyams asked tribunal staff to check whether the claimant had later sent an email containing a document that complied, or sought to comply, with that order. The tribunal inbox contained no such email.
The judge concluded under rule 72 that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. The application for reconsideration was refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refused the claimant's application for reconsideration of a reserved judgment. The supplied text does not determine the underlying unfair dismissal or public interest disclosure claims on their merits. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 72 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.