Case 3320530/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Iyashere v Gist Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320530/2021
- Decision date
- 3 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Iyashere
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone to decide whether the claimant had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal allowed the claimant to rely on anxiety/depression as well as back pain/sciatica. The alleged Equality Act contraventions were said to relate to the dismissal around 2 June 2021, with some allegations concerning absence or work rate said to have arisen earlier.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not shown that his skin condition was caused by stress or by any mental impairment, and that it was not the impairment relied on for the claim. For back pain/sciatica, the tribunal found earlier references in 2012 and 2014 did not establish an ongoing condition, and that symptoms in September 2020 had resolved. When the pain returned around 9 March 2021, it was the second bout within six months, and from that date it became likely that substantial adverse effects would last or recur beyond 12 months.
For anxiety/depression, the tribunal relied on GP records and medical correspondence showing mixed anxiety and depressive disorder, medication, attempted non-pharmaceutical treatment, and effects including low mood, sleeplessness, and avoidance of social interactions. It found that the impairment had a substantial and long-term adverse effect before the claimant's employment with the respondent began, and that later periods without substantial effects did not mean the condition had become only a past disability.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal decided that the claimant's back pain/sciatica was a disability from no later than 9 March 2021 and that his anxiety was a disability from a date before his employment with the respondent began. Liability for disability discrimination was not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office four questions
- Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Limited
- SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Herry v Dudley MBC
- Aderemi v London South East Railway Limited
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Rayner v Turning Point
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.