Case 3320582/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the First v Crouch Logistics Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320582/2021
- Decision date
- 6 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
3 namedClaimant
In person For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Cambridge on 10 October 2023, Employment Judge Brown heard the claim with the Claimant appearing in person and neither respondent attending. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded.
The tribunal held that the First Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages on 8 June 2021. It ordered the First Respondent to pay £1,500, described as the gross sum deducted, and stated that the Claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance where applicable.
The tribunal also recorded that the Second Respondent did not employ the Claimant and was only a statutory guarantor. The judgment states that it did not purport to place any additional liability on the Second Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and held that the First Respondent made an unauthorised deduction on 8 June 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.