Case 3320587/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Deborah Windridge v Tesco Family Dining Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320587/2021
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Deborah Windridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, after no response to Employment Judge Bedeau’s letter of 8 May 2022, the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract were struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability on either claim, only the procedural strike-out.
The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Tobin on 15 June 2022 and sent to the parties on 22 June 2022. No remedy was awarded because the claims were struck out before any merits or compensation decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Following no response to Employment Judge Bedeau’s letter of 8 May 2022, this claim was struck out pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Following no response to Employment Judge Bedeau’s letter of 8 May 2022, this claim was struck out pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.