Case 3320619/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Coombs v Superdrug Stores plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320619/2021
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
- Venue
- Watford via CVP
- Panel members
- Mrs G Binks, Mrs G Bhatt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Coombs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claim under rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal also ordered the claimant to pay the respondent's costs, summarily assessed at £500, because of the claimant's non-compliance with a case management order and the resulting need to postpone the final hearing. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment does not determine the substantive disability discrimination or unfair dismissal claims. It refuses the respondent's strike-out application and orders the claimant to pay £500 in costs to the respondent. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.