Case 3320638/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Alverez-Garcia v Ellis Miller London Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING (BY CVP) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320638/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloch QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Alverez-Garcia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by CVP at Watford on 12 November 2020, Employment Judge Bloch QC, sitting alone, dealt with part of Miss M Alverez-Garcia's claim against Ellis Miller London Limited. The respondent was represented by a solicitor and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal granted judgment for £1,676.62 in respect of part of the claimant's claim for wages and expenses. The judgment records that this part of the claim was admitted by the respondent, so there was no substantive dispute on liability for that sum.
The decision also records that the hearing in respect of the balance of the claimant's claim was postponed. No further liability findings or remedy breakdown are given in the written decision, and the note states that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment was entered for an admitted part of the claimant's claim for wages and expenses. The judgment does not separate the sum between wages and expenses, and the balance of the claim was postponed. | Upheld | — | £1,677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,677
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.