Case 3320643/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Plastow v The Chiltern Railway Company Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320643/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Plastow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment for Mr S Plastow under Rule 21 because The Chiltern Railway Company Limited did not present a response to the claim. On that basis, the tribunal recorded that Mr Plastow was unfairly dismissed.
The judgment did not determine compensation. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent did not present a response, so judgment was entered under Rule 21. The judgment records only that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that remedy would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.