Case 3320651/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Filipoiu v Bradshaw Support Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320651/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Filipoiu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 December 2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 28 October 2019, and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Warren ordered that the claim be struck out. The hearing fixed for 6 April 2020 was stated not to take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment does not describe the underlying pleaded cause of action, but the case was listed by gov.uk as breach of contract. The tribunal struck out the claim without a merits hearing after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.