Case 3320746/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Baron v Castle Valley Films Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3320746/2019
- Decision date
- 8 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Baron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 because Castle Valley Films Limited did not present a response. Employment Judge Anstis entered judgment in favour of Mr M Baron on the basis set out in the written judgment.
The tribunal found that Mr Baron was owed unpaid wages and treated the claim as an unauthorised deduction from wages. It awarded him £1,419.34 in compensation and ordered the respondent to pay that sum.
The listed hearing on 26 February 2020 was cancelled following the entry of judgment. No further findings, legal tests, or separate remedy components were set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £1,419.34 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,419 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,419
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,419
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.