Case 3320751/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Coles v Mr Paramjeet Thind 2.Mr Paulo Sousa Fernandes t/a Britains — 2021
- Case reference
- 3320751/2019
- Decision date
- 7 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Coles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 17 May 2021, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out for failure to comply with the order of 29 March 2021 and because the case had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Regional Employment Judge Foxwell therefore struck out the response on 7 June 2021. The judgment states that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The decision does not determine the underlying substantive claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the respondent's response, not the substantive employment claims. The reasons stated were non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 29 March 2021 and that the matter had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.