Case 3320757/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Gajjar v Mr C Saatchi and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3320757/2019
- Decision date
- 21 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Gajjar
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not respond to the Employment Tribunal's letter of 28 April 2021. A further letter dated 22 July 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it was not actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the underlying dispute, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim in the reasons; it states only that 'the claim is struck out' because it was not actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.