Case 3320774/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Fray (Equality Officer) For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320774/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr.
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr. Fray (Equality Officer) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records a single finding that Mr K. Mirindi was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the period from 1 April 2019 to 24 July 2019. The decision was given by Employment Judge Mr A Spencer sitting alone at Cambridge by CVP and telephone on 11 March 2022.
The extracted text does not set out any further substantive findings on the underlying claims, does not record the tribunal's disposal of those claims, and does not identify any monetary award or remedy. No separate lay members are listed, consistent with the judge sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment states only that the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 between 1 April 2019 and 24 July 2019. It does not record the substantive disposal of any discrimination claim or any award. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.