Case 3320784/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ram v Brisk Logistics Ltd (Debarred) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3320784/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ram
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Brisk Logistics Limited, did not present a response to the claim. The tribunal therefore entered judgment in favour of Mr A Ram under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal found that the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded him £240 in compensation, which the respondent was ordered to pay. The hearing listed for 3 February 2020 was cancelled following the default judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not present a response. Judgment was entered under Rule 21 and the claimant was found to be owed unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £240
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £240
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.