Case 3320793/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Malkowski v Wine Circle Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320793/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Malkowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Reading on 18 February 2020, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto heard Mr R Malkowski's complaints against Wine Circle Limited. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaints of breach of contract, unpaid wages and holiday pay.
No monetary award was made, and the judgment records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision. The record contains only the jurisdictional ruling and does not set out further findings on liability or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to consider this complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint of unpaid wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to consider this complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.