Case 3320807/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rodgers, unrepresented For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320807/2021
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr Dykes, Mr Bury
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Rodgers, unrepresented For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 21 and 22 November 2021 before Employment Judge Allen sitting with Mr Dykes and Mr Bury. The claimant, Mr Rolland Rodgers, was unrepresented and the respondent was represented by Mr Khan of Counsel.
The written judgment records a single outcome: the claim was not well founded and was dismissed. No separate liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award are recorded in the written decision provided.
The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure. On the available text, the only extractable substantive outcome is dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The gov.uk listing categorised the case as Race Discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.