Case 3320809/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Gillings v The Executive Committee and Members of Boxmoor Social Club — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320809/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Gillings
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr David Gillings's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded. It assessed the claimant's conduct and contribution towards his dismissal at 40%, and on that basis ordered the respondent to pay £6,497.45 as compensation for unfair dismissal.
The judgment also records a breach of contract claim in respect of unpaid notice. That claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, so no separate remedy was awarded on that head.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well-founded and assessed the claimant's conduct and contribution towards dismissal at 40%. It ordered payment of £6,497.45 as compensation for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £6,497 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim of breach of contract in respect of unpaid notice was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,497
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.