Case 3320821/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Victoria Louise v Snow Complete Care Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320821/2019
- Decision date
- 4 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Victoria Louise
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Watford Employment Tribunal on 3 June 2020, before Employment Judge Bedeau, the parties recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed in a document signed by them during judicial mediation.
The judgment is a consent judgment only. It records that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, and it contains no findings on liability, no merits assessment, and no award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment: the parties had agreed terms of settlement in a document signed by them, and the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Consent judgment: the parties had agreed terms of settlement in a document signed by them, and the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Consent judgment: the parties had agreed terms of settlement in a document signed by them, and the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Consent judgment: the parties had agreed terms of settlement in a document signed by them, and the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment: the parties had agreed terms of settlement in a document signed by them, and the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Consent judgment: the parties had agreed terms of settlement in a document signed by them, and the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.