Case 3320827/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Beeby v Tourmaster Coaches (crowland) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320827/2019
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Beeby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Tynan found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant gross sums of £739.98 for the outstanding balance of his statutory redundancy payment, £127.51 for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, and £35.12 for the correct sum in lieu of his notice period on termination.
The judgment states that the sums for holiday pay and notice pay are subject to PAYE deductions as appropriate. The hearing listed for 30 March 2020 was cancelled. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £902.61.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered payment of the outstanding balance of the claimant’s statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £740 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £128 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of the correct sum in lieu of the claimant’s notice period on termination. | Upheld | — | £35 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £903
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.