Case 3320830/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Kohanzad, Counsel For the v Miss S Lawrence, In-house Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320830/2021
- Decision date
- 28 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Kohanzad, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing in Nottingham on 8 April 2022, Employment Judge P Britton sat alone. Ms Angela Unufe was represented by Mr R Kohanzad and Elysium Healthcare Limited by Miss S Lawrence. The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim and the claim for unlawful deduction from wages or breach of contract were dismissed upon withdrawal. The only live issue was the direct race discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010, which had been presented on 29 September 2021.
The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 27 April 2021, not 14 April 2021 and not 23 April 2021. It found that the claimant was not told she had been dismissed at the disciplinary hearing on 14 April 2021, that the dismissal letter was dated 23 April 2021, and that she would have received it by 27 April 2021 at the latest. On that basis the primary time limit expired on 26 July 2021. After taking account of ACAS early conciliation from 16 July to 28 August 2021 under s.140B Equality Act 2010, the tribunal held that the claim deadline became 28 September 2021, so the ET1 was one day late.
The tribunal applied the just and equitable extension test under s.123 Equality Act 2010, referring to Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan. It accepted the claimant's explanation for the delay, including that she had no prior tribunal experience, had been supported by the RCN in the disciplinary process and appeal, had thought ACAS was still dealing with the matter, was occupied with proceedings before the NMWC, and said her health had deteriorated. The tribunal found that explanation credible, noted that the respondent did not advance a prejudice argument, and decided that it was just and equitable to extend time so the race discrimination claim could proceed. Case management directions then followed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | At this preliminary hearing the tribunal extended time under s.123 EqA 2010 so the direct race discrimination claim could proceed; the merits were not determined. | Other | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim covered non-payment of wages, including holiday pay, and an alternative breach of contract allegation; it was withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.140B Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (2021) EWCA Civ 23
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan (2018) EWCA Civ 640
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.