Case 3320831/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Joh Murphy v Remus Corporation UK Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320831/2021
- Decision date
- 30 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Joh Murphy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 30 November 2022 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. The claimant, Mr Joh Murphy, appeared in person and the respondent, Remus Corporation UK Limited (In Liquidation), did not attend.
The tribunal held that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay £25,000 for breach of contract.
The tribunal also held that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered payment of £209,410.15 for that claim. No separate findings on unfair dismissal or other claims are set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment in respect of notice and ordered payment of £25,000. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted text shows the award as '£209, 410.15'; interpreted as £209,410.15. | Upheld | — | £209,410 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £234,410
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.