Case 3320844/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jahanzeb Jahangir v Crown Car Services Limited Heard: Norwich by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320844/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jahanzeb Jahangir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting with Employment Judge M Warren on 7 November 2022, heard the claim in Norwich by CVP. The respondent did not attend. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The claimant's race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. The decision does not set out detailed written reasons in the extracted text, so no further findings are recorded here beyond the tribunal's express dismissal of that claim.
The claimant's unpaid wages claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,040 without deduction, and stated that the respondent was responsible for tax and national insurance. The judgment sum comprised £920 net unpaid wages for June 2021 and £120 for a promised payment relating to earlier late payment of wages.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the claimant was to be paid without deduction £1,040, made up of £920 net unpaid wages for June 2021 and £120 in respect of a promised payment for earlier late payment of wages. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,040
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.