Case 3320846/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Stack v Orsatech Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320846/2021
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss V Stack brought a claim against Orsatech Limited. The respondent did not file a response and did not attend the hearing. The tribunal therefore dealt with the claim on the material before it.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £720 without deduction. The decision records that the amount was calculated net of tax and national insurance, and that the respondent was responsible for paying any tax and national insurance due on the sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded and ordered payment of £720 without deduction. It also noted the figure was calculated net of tax and national insurance, which the respondent was responsible for accounting for. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.