Case 3320863/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Mavuso v And Castle Income Plus Ltd (cip Nursing) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320863/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Mavuso
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the Claimant's claim for Unauthorised Deduction from Wages under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. In its reasons, the Tribunal said that on 29 December 2019 it wrote to the Claimant to notify him that an Employment Judge was considering strike out because the claim had not been actively pursued, and that he was given until 20 January 2020 to object or request a hearing.
The Claimant did not respond to that letter, and the Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 7 February 2020 was cancelled. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for Unauthorised Deduction from Wages was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The Claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 29 December 2019, which gave him until 20 January 2020 to object or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.