Case 3320875/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Ling, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3320875/2019
- Decision date
- 20 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Forde
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms N Ling, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 22, 23 and 24 November 2021 before Employment Judge Forde sitting alone, the respondent's application to amend its response so that the issue of whether the claimant had been dismissed could be addressed was granted. The tribunal then found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
The tribunal also found there had been a breach of the claimant's terms and conditions of employment. In the same judgment it recorded that the claimant's claim for notice pay succeeded, which is reflected here as a breach of contract outcome upheld.
The tribunal further held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. It did not assess remedy in this judgment, because remedy was reserved to a later hearing.
The judgment stated that remedy would be dealt with at a separate hearing on 23 February 2022, and that the tribunal would consider whether the claimant should be reinstated to his previous position. No monetary award was fixed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The respondent's application to amend its response to address whether the claimant had been dismissed was granted. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found there was a breach of the claimant's terms and conditions of employment and recorded that the claimant's claim for notice pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.