Case 3320889/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Bharat Sachdev Respondent Stephen M S Lai & Co Business Consulting Ltd v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3320889/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Bharat Sachdev Respondent Stephen M S Lai & Co Business Consulting Ltd
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Reading CVP hearing on 4 January 2023, before Employment Judge Street, the Respondent did not attend and filed no response. The tribunal held that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed and that he had been harassed by the Respondent in a way related to his age, which the judgment treated as age discrimination. The tribunal also allowed two breach of contract heads: holiday pay and expenses incurred.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,284.61 and a compensatory award capped at £26,400. The reasons section records loss of earnings calculations for the prescribed period from 19 September 2021 to 4 January 2023, including a prescribed element of £13,063.13 and a balance after the prescribed element of £17,136.71. Recoupment applies.
For age discrimination, the tribunal awarded £2,000 for injury to feelings plus £447.65 interest, giving £2,447.65 inclusive of interest. The breach of contract awards were £3,045.90 for holiday pay (30 days) and £26.00 for expenses. The claims for notice pay, unlawful deduction from earnings and a redundancy payment were dismissed, the claimant was not permitted to amend the claim to include the matters set out in the letter of 22 August 2022, and the total sum ordered was £34,204.16.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award £2,284.61; compensatory award £26,400, capped by the statutory cap on damages. | Upheld | — | £28,685 |
| Age discrimination | Harassment related to age; award comprised £2,000 injury to feelings plus £447.65 interest, inclusive of interest. | Upheld | Age | £2,448 |
| Breach of contract | Holiday pay (30 days) awarded as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £3,046 |
| Breach of contract | Expenses incurred awarded as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £26 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment refers to unlawful deduction from earnings. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £34,204
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,285
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £26,400
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.