Case 3320894/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Dorosenko Mrs A Dorosenko v Panoramic Products Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3320894/2021
- Decision date
- 24 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Dorosenko Mrs A Dorosenko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to Mr D Dorosenko and Mrs A Dorosenko on 22 June 2026 warning that it was considering striking out their claims against Panoramic Products Ltd because the claims appeared not to have been actively pursued. The claimants were given an opportunity to explain why the claims should not be struck out or to request a hearing. They did not reply as directed by 29 June 2026.
Employment Judge Tynan found that the grounds for striking out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied and that striking out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The claims were therefore struck out. The judgment was approved on 24 July 2026 and sent to the parties on 1 September 2026. It records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claims in cases 3320894/2021 and 3320895/2021 without identifying their substantive claim types. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Overriding objective in Rule 3 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.